Sophos vs SentinelOne: Which Endpoint Security Wins in 2026?
Sophos vs SentinelOne compared on 2025-26 MITRE ATT&CK detection rates, pricing, 50-endpoint TCO, and fit for small business and MSPs.
Long Nguyen
Lập trình viên Fullstack · Kỹ sư AI · Nhà nghiên cứu
Sophos vs SentinelOne: quick verdict
Sophos and SentinelOne solve endpoint security from opposite ends. Sophos builds out from a connected portfolio — endpoint, firewall, and an in-house managed SOC (Sophos MDR) that share telemetry and can act on each other's detections. SentinelOne builds out from a single autonomous agent that makes containment decisions on the endpoint itself, without waiting on a cloud round-trip. Both are current Leaders in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Endpoint Protection Platforms, and both were named Champions in Omdia's 2026 Cybersecurity MSP Ecosystems Leadership Matrix.
| Factor | Sophos Intercept X / XDR | SentinelOne Singularity |
|---|---|---|
| Core architecture | Layered prevention + connected portfolio (endpoint, firewall, MDR share telemetry) | Single lightweight agent, on-device AI makes response decisions locally |
| Ransomware response | CryptoGuard file-encryption rollback | Storyline-based rollback (Windows & macOS) |
| Managed detection | Sophos MDR — native, in-house SOC | Vigilance MDR — separately purchased add-on |
| Latest independent test | 2025 MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise — 100% detection | Sat out 2025; 2024 MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise — 100% detection, 88% fewer alerts than median |
| Published pricing | No public list; street pricing roughly $28–$70+/endpoint/year across tiers | No public list; street pricing roughly $70–$230/endpoint/year across tiers |
| Strongest fit | SMBs and mid-market teams that want firewall, endpoint, and managed SOC from one vendor | Teams that want the leanest, most autonomous EDR core and don't mind buying MDR separately |
If you only read one section, read this: the two platforms land close on raw detection quality. The real difference shows up in how each one behaves once you add more of the vendor's stack around it — which is what the rest of this guide breaks down.
How Sophos and SentinelOne stop threats
Sophos Endpoint leans on attack-surface reduction first: web and category-based application control, exploit prevention, and CryptoGuard, which watches for the file-encryption behavior ransomware relies on and rolls back affected files without needing a full restore. Detections and health telemetry flow through Sophos X-Ops, so a signal from the firewall or email gateway can trigger a coordinated response on the endpoint — Sophos calls this synchronized security. Sophos MDR is built as an in-house managed service on top of that same telemetry, not a third-party add-on bolted on later.
SentinelOne's Singularity agent runs its detection and response models on the endpoint itself, so containment — isolation, quarantine, process kill, network lockdown — doesn't wait on a cloud decision. Every event on a machine gets stitched into a single attack narrative (Storyline), which is what lets an analyst see a whole incident instead of a pile of disconnected alerts, and what enables one-click rollback to a pre-attack state on Windows and macOS. Managed detection sits one layer up as Vigilance MDR, purchased separately from the endpoint license.
Practitioner read: for a team with no in-house SOC, Sophos's bundled MDR removes a purchasing decision — you're buying one relationship, not stitching an EDR vendor to a separate MDR vendor. For a team that already has (or is building) its own detection engineering, SentinelOne's single-agent, low-alert-volume design tends to generate less noise to triage, which matters more once you're the one staring at the console.
Sophos vs SentinelOne detection rates: what MITRE ATT&CK actually shows
The MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Evaluations are the closest thing endpoint security has to an independent, apples-to-apples test: MITRE researchers emulate a real threat actor's tactics against every participating product and score how much of the attack chain each one actually detected. Eleven vendors took part in the 2025 round, which for the first time included a cloud-focused attack chain (emulating Scattered Spider) alongside a state-sponsored espionage chain (emulating Mustang Panda) — 16 attack steps and 90 sub-steps across Windows, Linux, and AWS. Sophos participated and reported 100% detection across every step and sub-step, with technique-level (the highest-fidelity) detection on 86 of the 90 adversary activities evaluated.
SentinelOne did not participate in the 2025 Enterprise round. Its most recent published result is from the 2024 Enterprise evaluation, where SentinelOne detected 100% of the 80 tested sub-steps across Windows, Linux, and macOS, with zero detection delays and 88% fewer alerts generated than the median across all evaluated vendors.
| Evaluation round | Vendor | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Enterprise (11 vendors) | Sophos | 100% detection — 16/16 steps, 90/90 sub-steps; technique-level on 86/90 |
| 2025 Enterprise | SentinelOne | Did not participate |
| 2024 Enterprise | SentinelOne | 100% detection — 80/80 sub-steps; 88% fewer alerts than median |
How to read this fairly: a 100% detection score is table stakes among top-tier EDR vendors in any given round — the real signal is in the detail. Sophos's 2025 result is the freshest independent data point either vendor has right now, and it includes the new cloud-attack scenario, which is directly relevant if you run workloads in AWS. SentinelOne's 2024 low-alert-volume result is still meaningful two rounds later, because alert-to-noise ratio is an architectural property (how the agent correlates events), not something that resets every evaluation cycle. Skipping a round isn't itself a red flag — vendors sit out for product-roadmap reasons — but it does mean you're comparing a current number against an 18-month-old one, not two simultaneous results.
Sophos vs SentinelOne pricing
Neither vendor publishes a full public price list — both sell through partners and quote per deal, scaled by endpoint count, contract length, and which add-ons (XDR, MDR, identity protection) you attach. The figures below are approximate street-pricing bands compiled from partner and reseller pricing pages current in 2026, not official rate cards. Treat them as a starting point for budgeting, then get a scoped quote.
| Tier | Sophos Intercept X | Approx. $/endpoint/year |
|---|---|---|
| Entry (Advanced) | NGAV, EDR-lite, CryptoGuard, web/app control | ~$28 |
| Mid (Advanced with XDR) | Adds cross-product XDR investigation | ~$48 |
| Managed (Sophos MDR) | 24/7 human-led SOC on Sophos telemetry | ~$70–80+ |
| Tier | SentinelOne Singularity | Approx. $/endpoint/year |
|---|---|---|
| Core | AI-powered NGAV/EDR, 14-day retention, AI Security Assistant | ~$70–100 |
| Complete | Adds identity detection & response, 90-day retention, Managed Threat Hunting | ~$180 |
| Commercial / Enterprise | Adds agentic SOC triage, full-visibility forensics, 24/7 managed hunting | ~$230, higher enterprise tiers on request |
Sophos's ladder is cheaper to enter but the jump to a fully managed SOC (Sophos MDR) still lands you in roughly the same neighborhood as SentinelOne's mid tier. SentinelOne's ladder starts higher but Core already includes an AI assistant and real-time response — the cost climb comes from identity protection, longer retention, and managed hunting, which are optional depending on how mature your security operations already are.
Total cost of ownership: a 50-endpoint example
To make the pricing bands concrete, here's an illustrative year-one comparison for a 50-endpoint SMB choosing a mid-tier plan from each vendor — the tier most SMBs land on once they want EDR-grade investigation, not just antivirus.
| Item | Sophos (Advanced with XDR, ~$48/endpoint) | SentinelOne (Core, ~$85/endpoint) |
|---|---|---|
| Annual license (50 endpoints) | ~$2,400 | ~$4,250 |
| Managed detection, if added | Sophos MDR, same vendor, native integration | Vigilance MDR, separate add-on line item |
| Onboarding effort | Cloud console, agent-based rollout | Cloud console, agent-based rollout |
| Illustrative year-one range | ~$2,400–$4,000 (license only to license + MDR) | ~$4,250–$9,000 (license only to license + Vigilance) |
This is a budgeting sketch, not a quote — actual invoiced prices swing with your OS mix (servers typically cost more per unit than workstations), contract length, and negotiated MSP or reseller discounts, which both vendors offer more freely at renewal or quarter-end. At 50 endpoints, the license-cost gap between the two is real but usually smaller than the difference a managed-detection decision makes to your total spend.
Sophos vs SentinelOne for small business
Sophos took home the Small Business Endpoint (Windows) and Small Business Security Development awards at the SE Labs Awards 2026, and it's the more turnkey pick for an SMB with no dedicated security headcount: the entry endpoint tier, the firewall, and Sophos MDR are all one vendor relationship, one console, and one support line. If a phishing email gets through, Sophos's own MDR team is the one watching — you're not coordinating between an EDR vendor and a separate MDR vendor during an incident.
SentinelOne's Core tier is a strong prevention-and-detection layer on its own, but investigation and response are left to whoever is watching the console — there's no bundled human SOC until you add Vigilance MDR. That's the right trade for an SMB that already has some in-house IT capability (even part-time) and wants to keep the base license lean, or that's planning to add managed hunting once the business is big enough to justify it. If your team would genuinely leave alerts sitting unread, budget for MDR from day one on either platform — the license alone isn't a security program.
Sophos vs SentinelOne for MSPs
Both vendors were named Champions in Omdia's 2026 Cybersecurity MSP Ecosystems Leadership Matrix for multi-tenant architecture and PSA/RMM integration, and it's common enough for an MSP to run both as client-facing options rather than standardizing on one — several MSPs cite exactly that as a deliberate choice, not a failure to pick a winner. The practical differences that push an MSP one way or the other:
- Agent footprint: SentinelOne's single lightweight agent tends to be the lower-overhead option across a mixed fleet of client hardware, which matters when you're supporting whatever machines a client already owns.
- Cross-sell surface: Sophos gives an MSP firewall, endpoint, email, and MDR from one vendor relationship, which simplifies billing and reduces the number of vendor support escalations per client.
- Alert volume at scale: a platform that generates fewer, higher-confidence alerts per endpoint compounds in your favor once you're triaging across dozens of clients instead of one environment — this is where SentinelOne's low-noise MITRE result is most relevant to an MSP specifically.
Either way, the console and the endpoint agent are only half the stack. Most MSPs end up building or buying some custom glue — a script that reconciles endpoint counts against the PSA for billing, a dashboard that rolls detections up across every client tenant, a webhook that pushes high-severity alerts into the ticketing queue. If that's the gap you're staring at, that's exactly the kind of custom PSA/RMM and reporting integration work Netalith builds for MSPs, on top of whichever EDR platform you've already standardized on.
Which is better: Sophos or SentinelOne?
Neither is a wrong answer — both are current Gartner Magic Quadrant Leaders with recent 100% MITRE detection results. The choice comes down to what you'd rather buy alongside the endpoint agent:
- Choose Sophos if you want one vendor for endpoint, firewall, and a managed SOC; you're a small business without dedicated security staff; or you already run Sophos Firewall and want synchronized detection across both.
- Choose SentinelOne if you want the leanest, lowest-alert-volume EDR core and are comfortable buying managed hunting separately; you're an MSP optimizing for agent footprint across a mixed client fleet; or your workloads span Windows, Linux, and macOS evenly and you want a single agent architecture across all three.
- Run a pilot on both if you're an MSP building a two-platform offering — deploy each against the same 10–20 test endpoints for 30 days and compare real alert volume and false-positive rate in your own environment, not just the vendor's marketing numbers.
Whichever platform you land on, the security tooling is only as good as the operational glue around it. If you're weighing this decision alongside other technology needs — a client dashboard, a marketplace integration, or an AI-ready web presence — Netalith's team can scope what you actually need across software, ecommerce, and AI search visibility in one conversation.
Get a scoped quote from Netalith and tell us what you're building around your security stack.
CÂU HỎI THƯỜNG GẶP
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Which is better, Sophos or SentinelOne?
Neither wins outright — both are current Gartner Magic Quadrant Leaders with 100% detection in their most recent MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise evaluation. Sophos is the stronger pick for a small business that wants endpoint, firewall, and managed detection from one vendor; SentinelOne is the stronger pick for teams that want the leanest, lowest-alert-volume EDR core and are comfortable buying managed hunting separately.
How much do Sophos and SentinelOne cost per endpoint?
Neither publishes an official public price list. Street pricing reported by partners in 2026 runs roughly $28–$70+ per endpoint/year for Sophos Intercept X across its Advanced, Advanced with XDR, and MDR tiers, and roughly $70–$230 per endpoint/year for SentinelOne Singularity across its Core, Complete, and Commercial tiers. Always request a scoped quote — actual invoiced pricing depends on volume, contract length, and reseller discounts.
What would 50 endpoints cost on each platform?
As a rough, illustrative year-one estimate at mid-tier plans: Sophos Advanced with XDR runs around $2,400/year for 50 endpoints (license only), and SentinelOne Core runs around $4,250/year for 50 endpoints (license only). Adding managed detection — Sophos MDR or SentinelOne's Vigilance MDR — pushes both figures higher; get a quote for your exact OS mix and contract length.
Which platform do MSPs prefer, Sophos or SentinelOne?
Both were named Champions in Omdia's 2026 Cybersecurity MSP Ecosystems Leadership Matrix for multi-tenant architecture and PSA/RMM integration, and many MSPs offer both rather than standardizing on one. SentinelOne's single lightweight agent tends to have a lower footprint across mixed client hardware, while Sophos's bundled firewall-endpoint-MDR portfolio simplifies vendor management and billing for an MSP.
Did Sophos or SentinelOne score higher in the latest MITRE ATT&CK evaluation?
Sophos participated in the 2025 MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Evaluation and reported 100% detection across all 16 attack steps and 90 sub-steps. SentinelOne did not participate in the 2025 round; its most recent published result is from 2024, where it also reported 100% detection (80/80 sub-steps) along with 88% fewer alerts generated than the median vendor evaluated that year.